Designing a new handwriting font

autodidact notebooksIn this age of constant communication, the medium of our translation is homogenized into set typefaces of surprisingly limited variation. How can we regain our personal relationship with the physicality of the written word?

The English language gives us two options: printing or cursive. But for those of us who live, ski, and make love right on the edge of control, our bodies cannot be counted on to transmit the depths of our emotions using either of these two rigid systems with any legibility. Wrists cramp and tendons tighten in the effort to keep a balance between the flow of our ideas and their subsequent communication. What’s the solution? Designing our own new handwriting fonts!

Since the success of any system depends on its adaptability, accommodation, and regeneration, the primary criteria for any new handwriting font actually gives us plenty of space to play. It must be adapted to our bodies and ideals, accommodate readers accustomed to current systems, and regenerate through ease of transmission through learning.

Using the blank canvas living font as an example, let’s look at a specialized set of secondary criteria. Note: #1 and #2 combat my personal spaz factor, while #3 and #4 honour my individual ideals concerning love, symmetry, and neuroscience. personalized font creation table graphic

1- Limit of one pen stroke per letter
2- Limit of one sharp direction change per letter
3- Each letter must relate to mate (sigh… a hopeless romantic in pursuit of geometric elegance)
4- Must be intuitively legible in relation to previous font systems by triggering appropriate letter-form concepts in our neural network

Whatever you choose as your unique secondary criteria, remember to be as loyal as possible to our pre-wired letter-form concepts (upper and lowercase are part of the same cluster of neural connections and therefor interchangeable) because gestalt can only get you so far. Once you have a working theoretical system (see chart), it’s time to train the ol’ brain by practising until it becomes automatic and intuitive โ€“ won’t take as long as you think. When taking any system from theoretical to practical, in any field, modifications will most likely be required with respect to the original criteria. In this case, the yellow chart boxes indicate where certain geometric concessions had to be made (albeit painfully) in order to better accommodate readers.

Is the blank canvas living font a successful system? My hands and wrists don’t ache anymore; my research notes have a unprecedented cleanliness, and my individual passions are expressed every time I put pen to paper. Does it accommodate new readers? You be the judge! Click the top pic to enlarge the image and test it out for yourself. But even if adaptability and accommodation are satisfied, only time will tell whether the BCL handwriting font will regenerate beyond its originator.

IBM took market share in the 1960s because its computers accommodated (integrated with) its previous office offerings. And yes, even I the proud parent, can admit that the blank canvas living font has a few potential weaknesses in terms of accommodation: numbers must be circled for differentiationโ€™s sake, starting a sentence with a 3 can look rather odd, and the X and K can be a bit confusing for first time readers. blank canvas font samplerHowever, I must leave the resolution of these ‘minor’ issues to the next generation of BCL adopters, because every successful system evolves through time. But I will say that eliminating the upper/lowercase complication has proven to be surprisingly liberating and makes potential regeneration through learning a full 50% easier.

Most importantly, what’s made the whole ideation, development, and retraining process worthwhile is that I can finally read my own writing!

3 thoughts on “Designing a new handwriting font

  1. Brilliant concept! I totally get the ‘spaz’ factor – my problem too. I ended up that way because of the heroic attempt by my primary school to pulverise me into being right-handed, at all cost, when I was heavily dominant on the left. It didn’t work, though they did successfully give me cognitive lags (dominant side doesn’t switch, forcing double-journeys and circuit bottlenecks) that – among a LOT of other things – render my hand-writing utterly illegible. This sometimes to the point where it disappears altogether – I can’t even sign my own name if I’m tired or it’s a bad day. (Today was a GOOD day, which was handy as I had to sign 50 copies of one of my own books…)

    • Love your comment! One perk of the “‘spaz’ factor” (which seems to permeate every facet of my life lol) is that no one ever asked to borrow my notes in high school. But really, in our grand age of bathroom related paper products, the old prejudices against left handed people really ought to be scrapped. I can’t believe you were so brutalized as a child! Abuse takes many forms. After all the trauma, the following quote might cheer you up…

      “Tests conducted by St. Lawrence University in New York found that there were more left-handed people with IQs over 140 than right-handed people. Famous left-handed intellectuals include Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin, and Benjamin Franklin.”

      • I am HUGE Einstein fan! Apparently he was badly klutzy and couldnโ€™t tie his own shoelaces. This is, like, the guy who explained the entire universe! Only happens to the smartest people (ahem)! ๐Ÿ™‚

Share your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s